ISSN: 2168-9458
Journal of Stock & Forex Trading
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
 

On the Use of Games Theory in Financial Studies: The Case of Mixed Strategy Equilibrium

Jimmy Teng*
School of Economics, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia
Corresponding Author : Jimmy Teng
School of Economics
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia
Tel: +6(03)-8924-8745
E-mail: Jimmy.Teng@nottingham.edu.my
Received November 19, 2012; Accepted November 21, 2012; Published November 23, 2012
Citation: Teng J (2012) On the Use of Games Theory in Financial Studies: The Case of Mixed Strategy Equilibrium. J Stock Forex Trad 1:e117. doi: 10.4172/2168-9458.1000e117
Copyright: © 2012 Teng J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Stock & Forex Trading

Since the 1980s, there has been an increasing use of games theory in the field of finance, including stock and forex trading [1]. The standard assumption of perfect competition was challenged. Analysis with the assumption of strategic interactions which uses games theory implicitly or explicitly becomes more popular. The use of games theory in the field of finance brings many new insights and should definitely be encouraged. But it also means that finance specialists need to be familiar with a new field of knowledge. Furthermore, one should also caution that games theory itself is a relatively new field and many of the game theoretic solution concepts are still being researched, refined and revised, and are not without controversy.
I would like to give an example of a paper that relies on the use of a controversial game theoretic concept. That controversial concept is mixed strategy equilibrium, a fact well known among games theorists [2]. The paper I quoted below is Dezsi [3]. This is of course not denying the interesting and insightful results that the study had generated. The paper models the strategic interactions between a stock market manipulator and the National Securities Commission, the regulatory authority. It is a complete information simultaneous game. The manipulator chooses between manipulating the stock market for private gains and not doing so [4]. The National Securities Commission chooses between investigation in the stock market to punish and deter manipulation or not doing so. There is no pure strategy equilibrium. There is a unique mixed strategy equilibrium in which both the manipulator and the National Securities Commission randomizes. While the results are interesting, further examination reveals certain anomalies that are common to models involving the use of mixed strategy equilibrium.
The unique mixed strategy equilibrium is
,
Note that when the gains from market manipulation (r) increases and finally equals to the fine (a) imposed by the National Securities Commission, and when the cost of investigation (c) incurred by the National Securities increases and finally equals to the gains of investigation a + com(1−α ) , the unique mixed strategy equilibrium has the manipulator playing manipulation with greater probability and with certainty when r equals a and, the National Securities Commission playing investigation with greater probability and with certainty when c= a + com(1−α ) . The problem, however, is that when c equals to a + com(1−α ) , we have c−a =α .com > 0 . That being the case, from the payoff matrix, it is clear then the strategy Investigate is weakly dominated by the strategy Not Investigate. As such, the equilibrium result that strategy Investigate is played with probability one is implausible. On the other hand, when r decreases and equals to 0 and c decreases and equals to 0, the mixed strategy equilibrium becomes p=0 and q=0. Yet, in this case, NI is weakly dominated by I and the unique mixed strategy equilibrium is again implausible. Of course, such anomalies of mixed strategy equilibrium are well known among games theorist (Table 1).
In sum, there is a lot to gain for researchers to be more familiar with games theory and apply it to the field of finance.
References
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
 
Share This Article
   
 
   
 
Relevant Topics
Disc Account
Disc Accountancy and Finance
Disc Accounting Information
Disc Accounting Review
Disc Accounting ethics
Disc Accounting information system
Disc Applied Economics
Disc Assessment Scales
Disc Audit
Disc Avenues of Investment
Disc Balance sheet
Disc Banking
Disc Banking Research Studies
Disc Budgeting
Disc Bullion Market
Disc Business
Disc Business Administration
Disc Business Cycle
Disc Business Theory
Disc Capital Marketing
Disc Capital Markets
Disc Capital Movements
Disc Capital Structure
Disc Central Administration
Disc Chief Marketing Officer
Disc Computable General Equilibrium Model
Disc Corporate Finance
Disc Corporate Governance Structure
Disc Cost Accounting
Disc Credit
Disc Currency
Disc Deflation
Disc Demand Theory
Disc Democratic Republic
Disc E-Retailing Market
Disc Economic Cycle
Disc Economic Policy
Disc Economics Studies
Disc Electronic Commerce
Disc Elements of Management
Disc Empirical Analysis
Disc Entrepreneurial Management
Disc Exchange Traded Funds
Disc Fair Trade
Disc Finance and accounting
Disc Finance of Commodity Markets
Disc Financial Analysis
Disc Financial Markets
Disc Financial Reporting
Disc Financial Reporting Standard
Disc Financial Risk
Disc Financial and Nonfinancial Information
Disc Financial plan
Disc Financial valuation
Disc Fiscal and tax policies
Disc Human Capital
Disc Human Resources
Disc Income Smoothing
Disc Indexation
Disc Industrial Business
Disc Inflation
Disc Intellectual Capital Disclosures
Disc Intellectual property
Disc International Business
Disc International Relations
Disc International finance
Disc Investment
Disc Macro Economics
Disc Management
Disc Management Accounting
Disc Marginal Utility
Disc Market Analysis
Disc Market Equilibrium
Disc Marketing Analysis
Disc Marketing Performance
Disc Marketing management
Disc Marketing-Accounting-Finance Interface
Disc Monetary Policy
Disc Nasdaq
Disc New Trade Theory
Disc Organizational studies
Disc Panel Data
Disc Parameter Estimation
Disc Primary Market
Disc Profitability
Disc Public Administration
Disc Public Civil Services
Disc Public Financial Management
Disc Public Human Resource Management
Disc Public Sector Employment
Disc Regulation and Management
Disc Reporting Management
Disc Resource Management
Disc Scientific Management
Disc Secondary Market
Disc Small Firms
Disc Social Security Funds
Disc Statistics
Disc Stock Exchange Business Studies
Disc Stock Market Returns
Disc Stock Return Predictability
Disc Strategic Cost Analysis
Disc Strategic Information
Disc Taxation
Disc Time Series
Disc Trading forex
Disc Voluntary Administration
Disc Wealth Management
Disc spreadsheet design
 
Recommended Journals
Disc Accounting Research Journals
Disc Public Administration Journals
Disc Accounting Journals
Disc Business Journals
Disc Economics Journals
  View More»
 
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article
 
Article usage
  Total views: 3732
  [From(publication date):
March-2013 - Jul 01, 2016]
  Breakdown by view type
  HTML page views : 4
  PDF downloads :3728
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

 
OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version