alexa International Business and Institutional Change | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2167-0234
Journal of Business & Financial Affairs
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

International Business and Institutional Change

Masao Nakamura*

Sauder School of Business and Institute of Asian Research, University of British Columbia, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Masao Nakamura
Sauder School of Business and Institute of Asian Research
University of British Columbia, Canada
Tel: 604-822-8434
Fax: 604-822-8477

Received February 13, 2012; Accepted February 14, 2012; Published February 17, 2012

Citation: Nakamura M (2012) International Business and Institutional Change. J Bus & Fin Aff 1:e107. doi:10.4172/2167-0234.1000e107

Copyright: © 2012 Nakamura M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Business & Financial Affairs

One of the main differences between domestic and international business is that international business (IB) comes with various risks that domestic business (DB) does not share. Examples of IB risks include the exchange rate risk, country-specific culture risk and political risk. Yet another IB risk encompassing a broad spectrum of uncertainties is the risks associated with an institutional change in a foreign country where IB investments have been made. There has been little systematic academic research regarding this sort of risk, of even a case study nature.

As an example of the latter sort of risk, consider the new business environments in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both of these countries are experiencing the departure of U.S. and other Western military forces. Resulting uncertainties include the unknown degree of Western democracy and customs that may remain after the Western military forces leave. Yet these countries are of considerable IB interest to Western firms, despite the risk, because of potentially high economic growth. These business risks combine political, economic, cultural and other types of risks. These risks might be compared to those experienced by Western firms when the Germany ceased to be divided by the Berlin Wall, or when the Soviet Union collapsed. Even though many Western firms thought they knew those countries, few were able to predict the timing and speed of the fall of the Berlin Wall or the collapse of the Soviet empire.

Of course, institutional changes that affect IB can occur in Western countries as well. For example, Japan’s corporate governance (CG) reforms, which began in the mid 1990s and were intended to transform that country’s inward-looking, bank-based CG system into a more market-based, transparent U.S. style CG system, has resulted in a mixed bag of actual CG changes. By now most U.S.-style CG institutional arrangements are allowed. So, a Japanese corporation potentially can run their management on an entirely U.S. style CG system driven by shareholder value maximization.

In reality, however, few Japanese firms have fully embraced U.S. style CG. This outcome was enabled though not expected, because, in adopting the U.S. style CG legal settings and institutions, the Japanese government proceeded with selective adaptation. With this approach, the new reform CG laws allow Japanese firms to choose, in multiple respects, between the U.S. style and the traditional Japanese style CG style practices.

While new transparency and disclosure practices have been implemented and the degree of enforcement is surely tougher than before, there is still a distance in this regard between Japanese versus U.S. and other Western countries’ enforcement practices. Many Japanese firms continue to observe the traditional stakeholder welfare maximization principle. Hence shareholders still often have been left feeling powerless (with this being particularly true for even very large individual and foreign shareholders). The Steel Partners and other investment funds from the U.S. thought the Japanese M&A market had become like the U.S. market following Japan’s CG reforms and pursued hostile takeovers of some Japanese firms, assuming the outcomes would be consistent with the shareholder value maximization. But this is not what happened in many cases. Hostile takeovers are still not welcome in Japan to a large extent. The consequences of CG change in Japan have proved to be unpredictable [1].

Another example of an institutional change of a significant scale for Western business firms is taking place in Europe. It is well understood by now that having a single currency like the euro for many countries with very different economies leads to problems, especially when those countries still retain and exercise their own economic policies without binding central coordination (e.g., EU’s current problems with Greece and other member countries). Already much uncertainty has resulted and firms with IB interests in Europe are already suffering related losses.

We expect that our new open-access research outlet, the Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, will be particularly suited for timely research findings for issues involving rapidly changing world circumstances, including the type of business risks arising from rapidly changing national institutional change circumstances.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 3835
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2012 - Jul 24, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 102
  • PDF downloads :3733

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version